أكذوبة الجنس "الآمن"

[أمَة الرحمن]

مع تشريع و تقنين الإباحية الجنسية في الغرب لم يكن مستغرباً أن تتفشى بينهم الأمراض الجنسية و تنتشر انتشار النار في الهشيم.

من هنا ظهر للوجود مصطلح "الجنس الآمن" بالتزامن مع الدعوة للتحرّر الجنسي، بزعهمهم أن اتخاذ الإحتياطات اللازمة قبل ممارسة الجنس (من واقي ذكري و غيره) سيقي و يحدّ من انتشار هذه الأمراض الجنسية (على فرض أن الإنسان في لحظة الشهوة العارمة يكون بكامل سيطرته على بدنه و على قواه العقلية، بحيث يتمهّل لاتخاذ احتياطاته في كل مرة يفور فيها دمه بالشهوة!).

و تمت فعلاً اقامة برامج توعية و تأهيلية ضخمة - أنفقت فيها ملايين الدولارات - للشباب و المراهقين على مدار عقود من الزمن.

فماذا كانت النتيجة يا ترى؟؟؟

تزايد انتشار الأمراض الجنسية في عام 2012 عما سبقه (وخاصة بين الشواذ جنسياً):

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/20...ncreased-2012/

بل و ظهور أمراض جنسية جديدة:

http://womenshealth.about.com/b/2007...discovered.htm

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100685883

فهنيئاً لهؤلاء بانحلالهم الأخلاقي، و سحقاً لمن يسعى لنقل عفن أمراضهم إلى مجتمعاتنا.

[مسلم أسود]

المثير للسخرية يا أمة هو أن الصفحة التي أشرت إليها تنصح باستخدام الواقي المزعوم للحماية من المرض .

[أمَة الرحمن]

المثير للسخرية يا أمة هو أن الصفحة التي أشرت إليها تنصح باستخدام الواقي المزعوم للحماية من المرض .

مهزلة و الله. صحيح أن الواقي نفسه قد ينفع في أكثر الحالات (وليس كلها أو معظمها)، لكن هذا على فرض أن مستخدمها ليس شهوانياً، لأن قوة و اندفاع الشهوة لا تتيح للإنسان لأن يتمهّل و يتخذ احتياطاته لاستخدام هذا الواقي بشكل صحيح في كل مرة يزني فيها! و سلملي على ثقافة المجتمع الغربي الغارق في الشهوانية حتى قمة رأسه.

دع عنك الناس البسطاء - في الأحياء الفقيرة في الدول المتقدمة و النامية - الذين تتفشى بينهم الدعارة و الانحلال الأخلاقي و لا تتوفر لديهم هذه "الثقافة" الجنسية و لا يملكون أدوات الوقاية بحكم بيئتهم و ظروفهم المعيشية.

منظمات الصحة العالمية تعترف بانهاك ميزانياتها و عدم قدرتها على الوصول لهؤلاء المساكين و مساعدتهم:

William Smith, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors, said in a statement: ”The long-term consequences of these diseases impact the health of the individual, burden our larger health care system, and drastically hinder our continued fight against HIV and AIDS.”

“Simply put, STD public health programs do not have enough resources to address all the serious problems that face them. As a result, thousands, if not millions, of Americans at risk for STDs are not able to be reached, which has long-term human and economic costs,” said Smith. “STD programs desperately need additional funding to address these rising rates and meet our STD epidemics effectively.”

[أمَة الرحمن]

Sexually Transmitted Diseases (or STDs) are at unprecedented and epidemic proportions. Thirty years of the sexual revolution is paying an ugly dividend.

Is "Safe Sex" Really the Answer?

I must now take a hard look at the message of "safe sex" which is being taught to teens at school and through the media across the country.


Some people believe that if teens can be taught how to use contraception and condoms effectively, that rates of pregnancy and STD infection will be reduced dramatically. But the statistics and common sense tell us otherwise. At Rutgers University, the rates of infection of students with STD varied little with the form of contraception used. For example, 35 to 44% of the sexually active students were infected with one or more STDs whether they used no contraceptive, oral contraceptive, the diaphragm, or condoms. It is significant to note that condoms, the hero of the "safe sex" message, provided virtually no protection from STDs.


Will condoms prevent HIV infection, the virus that causes AIDS? While it is better than nothing, the bottom line is that condoms cannot be trusted. A study from Florida looked at couples where one individual was HIV positive and the other was negative. They used condoms as protection during intercourse. Obviously these couples would be highly motivated to use the condoms properly, yet after 18 months, 17% of the previously uninfected partners were now HIV positive. That is a one-in-six chance, the same as in Russian roulette. Not good odds!


Condoms do not even provide 100% protection for the purpose for which they were designed: prevention of pregnancy. One study from the School of Medicine Family Planning Clinic at the University of Pennsylvania reported that 25% of patients using condoms as birth control conceived over a one-year period. Other studies indicate that the rate of accidental pregnancy from condom-protected intercourse is around 15% with married couples and 36% for unmarried couples.

Condoms are inherently untrustworthy. The FDA allows one in 250 to be defective. Condoms are often stored and shipped at unsafe temperatures which weakens the integrity of the latex rubber causing breaks and ruptures. Condoms will break 8% of the time and slip off 7% of the time. There are just so many pitfalls in condom use that you just can't expect immature teenagers to use them properly. And even if they do, they are still at risk.

Studies are beginning to show that school-based sex education that includes condom use as the central message does not work. A study in a major pediatric journal concluded that "the available evidence indicates that there is little or no effect from school-based sex-education on sexual activity, contraception, or teenage pregnancy." This study evaluated programs that emphasized condoms. Over $3 billion dollars has been spent on sex- education programs emphasizing condoms with little or no effect! In addition, programs that emphasize condoms tend to give a false sense of security to sexually active students and make those students who are not having sex feel abnormal. Hardly the desired result!

The list of damages from unmarried adolescent sexual activity is long indeed. Apart from the threat to physical health and fertility, there is damage to family relationships, self-confidence and emotional health, spiritual health, and future economic opportunities due to unplanned pregnancy. Condom-based sex-education does not work.

http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/epid-std.html

يعترفون صراحة بما جنوه على أنفسهم و لا يعتبرون!!

[أمَة الرحمن]

و يا ترى ماذا حدث بعد ضجة عام 2012 الذي تزايدت فيه نسب انتقال الأمراض الجنسية إلى حد مهوّل؟؟

لا زالت النسبة في ازدياد!

The increase in sexually transmitted diseases in San Diego outpaced the nationwide uptick in 2012, according to a report out today.

In figures compiled by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, increases were discovered both nationally and locally for chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis in 2012, the most recent year for which figures are available.

http://scoopsandiego.com/lifestyles/...9bb30f31a.html


'Ongoing, severe epidemic' of STDs in US, report finds

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...364889&safe=on

[أمَة الرحمن]

More Than 110 Million Americans Have an STD

The numbers are not good.

One of the more concerning findings was that there are nearly 20 million new infections each year, and half of those occur among young people (aged 15 to 24).

And the cost of treating STDs is substantial: The lifetime cost of treating 20 million infections a year comes close to $16 billion, the report showed.

http://health.usnews.com/health-news...-an-std-report

[أمَة الرحمن]

ماذا عمّا يسمى بـ "حبة الصباح التالي" (من وسائل منع الحمل بعد الجماع للمرأة)؟

المضحك أنها نفسها تسبّبت بزيادة نسبة انتقال الأمراض الجنسية، و لم تنفع كثيراً في منع الحمل و خفض نسبة عمليات الإجهاض!

‘Emergency contraception’ increases STD rates, does not reduce abortions, new study finds

“One of the worst ramifications of the easy availability of emergency contraception is the false sense of security that it gives to girls and women,” Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., director and senior fellow of The Beverly LaHaye Institute, told LifeSiteNews.com.

“We’ve reached a point in America where those who promote left-wing ideologies about ‘reproductive care’ have lost all sense of responsibility for the well-being of our young people,” Dr. Crouse told LifeSiteNews. “Instead, the adults have sold out to the special interests, and our girls and women are paying a very high price in terms of their overall health and well-being.”

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eme...bortions-new-s

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new...n-teenage-stds

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0131133121.htm

[أمَة الرحمن]

ما يلفت النظر - و هو ما لاحظه عقلائهم - أنه على الرغم من عدم ضمان نجاح وسائل الوقاية من الأمراض الجنسية، إلا أنها تعطي احساساً زائفاً بالأمان، مما يدفع الشباب لممارسة الفواحش أكثر و بالتالي يزيد تلقائياً من احتمال اصابتهم بالأمراض!

[أمَة الرحمن]

و لا تزال فاحشة اللواط هي الأعلى نسبةً من حيث انتقال و انتشار الأمراض الجنسية:

http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1

http://std.about.com/od/glbtcommunit...isk-Of-Hiv.htm

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/conten...ppl_3/S79.full

http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-p...TDFact-MSM.htm

[OMMNYR]

حتى و إن كانت درجة الأمان ( للزنى الآمن ) مائة بالمائة فلا تعنى للمسلم شيئا إذ إن للقضية بعدا آخر لديه أسمى من الأمان من الأمراض و هو الأمان من العذاب

[أمَة الرحمن]

حتى و إن كانت درجة الأمان ( للزنى الآمن ) مائة بالمائة فلا تعنى للمسلم شيئا إذ إن للقضية بعدا آخر

صدقت، أخي.

لكننا للأسف نتعامل مع قومٍ ماديين شهوانيين ماتت بداخلهم قيم العفة و السمو الأخلاقي، فلا يبقى إلا أن نريهم نتائج فسادهم لعلّهم يفيقون من سكرتهم و حتى لا يغتر بدعواهم ضِعاف الإيمان من بني جلدتنا.

[أمَة الرحمن]

يقول Thomas Sowell:

"Women’s Liberation" and the "sexual revolution" have not liberated women. They have liberated the sort of man who is a ‘love and leave em‘ kind of guy, who lets the woman deal with the consequences, including pregnancy.

Nationwide, a majority –54 percent- of all black children were living only with their mothers in 1992. However, this was not a legacy of slavery as sometimes claimed. As recently as 1970, a majority of black children were still living with both parents.

Both venereal diseases and unwed teenage pregnancy were going down before “the heroic sixties” dawned. Gonorrhea declined in every year of the 1950s from what it was the year before. There were only half as many cases of syphilis in 1960 as in 1950.

Enter the modern, “enlightened” and “healthy” view of sex that was to be spread throughout the schools of the land under the dishonest title of “sex education.” It was not education about biology but propaganda designed to replace the values that children had absorbed from their families, from “society” and other sources disdained by the anointed. Downward trends in both venereal disease and teenage pregnancy reversed during this “heroic” decade and headed skyward.

[( محمد الباحث )]

هل تعلمون ما عدد حالات الاجهاض في امريكا فقط منذ 1973 ؟؟؟
مليون ؟؟ خمسة ملايين ؟؟كم يا تري

هؤلاء هم دعاة الانسانية , الملاعيين قتلوا اكثر من 56 مليون طفل بملئ اراداتهم ! أمه كامله مسحوها من الحياة تبا لهم و لإراداتهم , بذريعة (my body >>>my choice) لكن و الله لا نعاتبهم ابدا ! فهذه نتائج الالحاد و العلمانيه و افرازاتها .
المصدر :
http://www.lifenews.com/2014/01/12/5...-wade-in-1973/
http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/01/1...-vs-wade-1973/

[أمَة الرحمن]

بذريعة (my body >>>my choice)

هذه و الله أحقر ذريعة! و كأن الذي بداخل رحم المرأة كائن سرطاني لها الحق بالتخلص منه -لعذر أو بغير عذر- و ليس جسداً بشرياً في طور النمو!

لكنه أيضاً من مكر الله بهم. فأوروبا و أمريكا الآن تصرخ من قلّة مواليدها و تزايد مواليد المسلمين:

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1080.html

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_br...26/index1.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotk...-rates-stupid/