من منكن تسحسن "الإحتفال "باليوم التافه للمرأة 8 مارس ؟

انا اقول ان الرجال اصحاب هذه المظالم يبالغون

هي نفسها الملحدة التي قلتِ لي عنها سابقًا صح؟

و جميع بنود قانون الإعتداء الجسدي تتحيّز للمرأة بشكل صارخ بحيث لو هاجمته هي ابتداءً و ضربها هو دفاعاً عن نفسه فهو الذي سيُعاقب جنائياً (بحجة ان الفارق البدني بين الرجل و المرأة لا يبيح له الإعتداء عليها لأي عذر و لو لرد عدوانها).

This IS the work of Feminism.

Don’t believe me?… read this little snippet for determining predominant aggressor:

Police must be aware of the many strategies victims utilize to reduce the risks to themselves and their children; for example, a victim may strike in anticipation of the aggressor’s violence as a means to prevent a higher level of violence, or to prevent harm to a child or a pet. These considerations will provide the most accurate account of the violent incident and of the total family dynamic.

See, so him hitting HER is domestic violence. Her hitting HIM is trying to *prevent* domestic violence. Neat trick, huh?

It gets better…

According to the Duluth Model, “women and children are vulnerable to violence because of their unequal social, economic, and political status in society”.[4]

The Duluth Model is based on a “violence is patriarchal" model. The model focuses solely on the men’s use of violence in abusive relationships, rather than on the behavior of all parties concerned. This helps the men to focus on changing their personal behavior in order to be nonviolent in any relationship.

So it’s still socially acceptable to beat the shit out of men… BECAUSE FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES IT’S STILL FUCKING LEGAL TO.

:He knows just as much as she does that if he calls the cops he’s the one going to prison

I agree that violence, regardless of gender or sex is wrong, however the legistlation that has successfully been lobbied by feminist organizations like NOW is very clear: men are legally recognized as perpetrators, and women recognized legally as victims. The prevalence of the Duluth model of domestic violence (and the “predominant aggressor” attitude that follows) as a matter of police policy is a testament to their lobbying.

Most feminists I have met have been for equality. Most have also not been members of the feminist lobby. As a political force, this can be laid both at the feet of the feminist lobby, and weak, capitulating politicians.

Moreover the “she hit me so I can hit her,” idea is often a misrepresentation of people’s beef with the current orthodox domestic violence model. Under the current policy, if a man punches a woman who is swinging a knife at him, it is presumed that she was trying to attack him to prevent him from attacking her. If he strikes her, he is only confirming the presumption that he is violent and she was acting defensively. If he doesn’t strike her, it only means her method of preventing him from being violent is successful. If he calls the police to report her violence against him, if the officers follow official policy, he is arrested, removed from the home, and she is free while he is processed. Sometimes a violent reaction can mean the difference between life and death for a person, and like the “zero tolerance” policy in public schools, it punishes the person defending themselves rather than the attacker.

Feminists created the Duluth model for domestic violence that says only men commit domestic abuse and only women suffer it. Thanks to VAWA, if a man calls about an abusive spouse, he is himself arrested.

Feminists control all the discourse on domestic violence, while men can’t get a single penny for domestic violence shelters for male victims.





Feminists are trying to close women’s prisons in the UK.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wom...s-prisons.html

Feminists mock the massive suicide rate of men.



Feminists mock male domestic violence victims.

http://jezebel.com/294383/have-you-e...use-uh-we-have

Feminists brought back debtors prison for fathers who can’t afford child support, even if they children who were raped having to pay off their rapist.



Feminists insist that women are at higher risk than any other group despite the overwhelming majority of victims of violent crime being men.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s0311.pdf


Feminists have abolished “innocent until proven guilty” when it comes to men who are falsely accused.



Feminists deny that men are raped at all, let alone just as often. If not more.





Feminists have erased many female victims due to the “only men rape” paradigm.



Feminists say that being called a slut is oppression but being called a rapist is nothing to be upset about even if you get killed by vigilantes or driven to suicide because “lolz male tearz”.

Even if you would talk about what feminism did to male domestic violence victims, the answer wouldn’t be “nothing”. [U]They tried their darn most to keep recognition of male victims down, threatened and killed for that purpose. They killed a dog at least from what I know. Look up Erin Pizzey, if you don’t believe me.

قوانين العائلة بعد الطلاق تسلب الأب كل حقوقه في التواصل مع أبنائه من دون رضا الأم و اشرافها.

كلام صحيح مائة بالمائة و عايشت أمور كتلك فى أكثر من دولة غربية و قد كان لدى صديق امريكي عانى معاناة شديدة من هذا الأمر و تم الحجز على بيته و بعض أمواله لصالح زوجته اللعوب

احاول منذ البارحة بكل جوارحي ان اتعاطف مع الرجال، حاولت بكل قوة لكن لا فائدة

أعرفكِ جيداً يا مس سايكوباث