أجنحة الطيور الضامرة... لدى العقول الضامرة

1- لماذا لا يطير هؤلاء

صدقني يا اخي هذا تبيان واضح لعظمة الله وقدرته...
ليس كما إدعى البائس كوين ساخرا...
بما معناه: "إذا كان لا بد للنعام ان تعدو لماذا خلقت على هيئة طائر"

نعم على هيئة طائر...
ونقولها على سقف السطح...
ليبين الله لنا ان لا شيء يعجزه...
الدليل: آدم, حواء, المسيح عليه السلام... وكل البشر!!!

برأيك ما الحكمة من خلق المسيح عليه السلام من ام دون اب...
هناك اربعة احتمالات:
1- لا ذكر ولا أنثى---> آدم
2- ذكر دون أنثى---> حواء
3- أنثى وذكر---> أنا وانت وكل الناس
ماذا بقي يا عزيزي:
4- أنثى دون ذكر---> انه المسيح عليه السلام!!!!

لأن الله يخلق ما يشاء بالاسباب وبخلافه...
(وَاللَّهُ خَلَقَ كُلَّ دَابَّةٍ مِن مَّاء فَمِنْهُممَّن يَمْشِي عَلَى بَطْنِهِ وَمِنْهُم مَّن يَمْشِي عَلَى رِجْلَيْنِ وَمِنْهُم مَّن يَمْشِي عَلَى أَرْبَعٍ يَخْلُقُ اللَّهُ مَا يَشَاءُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ )[النور : 45]"

(الحمد لله فاطر السماوات والأرض جاعل الملائكة رسلا أولي أجنحة مثنى وثلاث ورباع يزيد في الخلق ما يشاء)
ام أنك تريد ان تسقط التطور على الملائكة ايضا؟
اخبرني ما الحكمة من تعدد أجنحة الملائكة؟
انها دليل على قدرة الله... يفعل ما يشاء ويختار!

يتبع ان شاء الله...

فكما انه هناك دليل على حكمة الله في تغيير القاعدة نجد ذلك في عالم الحيوان...
فإن كان الاصل عند الانسان الولادة من ذكر وأنثى... فغير الله هذه القاعدة تبيانا لقدرته جل وعلا...

سأمضي معك قائلا ان الطيور خلقت لتطير... ولكن الله لا يعجزه شيء... وقد غير هذه القاعدة في مواضع قليلة...تبيانا للحكمة... فهناك:
1- طيور تسبح---> البطريق
2- طيور سريعة سرعة هائلة---> النعام
سرعة عجيبة... قدرة الله... في كائن اصله مخصص للطيران تراه اسرع بـكثير من الحيوانات السريعة...
أنا صدمت لهذه المعلومة... فاتق الله يا رجل...

It is distinctive in its appearance, with a long neck and legs, and can run at up to about 70 km/h (43 mph)



يتبع
خرق القاعدة هذه يطال كثيرا إن لم يكن كل الدواب:
فإن قلت ان أصل الثدييات العيش على الارض...
هناك خرق:
1- ثدييات سابحة---> الحوت
2- ثديات تطير---> الخفاش

أما قولك انك تريد حيتان تلد وترضع بخياشيم؟!!!
اتق الله يا رجل...
ومع ذلك لن أخيبك كما وعدت...
معلومة ستبهرك ان شاء الله...
لا عليك...نحن تحت الطلب...
هناك كائنات تلد... هل هي من الثديات؟؟!!!
لا ورب السماء...
the more developed form of vivipary is called placental viviparity. Placental mammals are the best example, but other animals have also adapted by incorporating this principle. Examples include some species of scorpions[2] and cockroaches,[3] certain genera of sharks and snakes, and velvet worms.


على علمي فان القروش عندها خياشيم ومع ذلك فهي تلد!!! ما رايك ... هل وفينا بالوعد؟
وكذلك عند الزواحف كائنات تطير كما سيلي ...
وأخرى تسبح كالتمساح ...
وغير ذلك...
ما رأيك الآن؟!...

هذه هدية مني لك اخي... ارجو ان تقبلها...

news.nationalgeographic.com

ب- ماذا عن العظام المجوفة؟

من قال ان الدجاج لا يطير البتة...
Domestic chickens are not capable of long distance flight, although lighter birds are generally capable of flying for short distances, such as over fences or into trees (where they would naturally roost). Chickens may occasionally fly briefly to explore their surroundings, but generally do so only to flee perceived danger.



كم مرة خرجت من بيتي ورأيت الدجاج على اغصان الشجر...
كيف ستهرب هذه المسكينة من الخطر ان لم يكن كذلك وهي بالكاد تمشي؟...
وسيلي الحديث عن الدجاج ان شاء الله...
ولكن اخبرني...
هل عندك دليل ان الدجاج يمكن ان يطير بدون هذا النوع من العظام؟...
الا يكفيه ثقل الوزن...

واخبرني عن النعام... كيف عرفت ان التجاويف عندها لا تساعدها في الجري؟... أنا في الانتظار...

وللكوي حديث آخر... فانتظر ولا تعجل...

The platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) is a semiaquatic mammal endemic to eastern Australia, including Tasmania. Together with the four species of echidna, it is one of the five extant species of monotremes, the only mammals that lay eggs instead of giving birth.

Scientists also identified a set of genes associated with platypus venom production.

Male platypuses produce a pain-inducing, snake-like venom, composed of at least 19 different substances, which is delivered to enemies or rival males through spurs on the males' hind legs.

Previous studies of venomous snakes had found that poison production is the result of evolutionary modifications to genes that once served other functions .

Some of the same genes appear to have modified in the platypus, but in a process entirely separate from the evolution of venom in snakes, according to the new study

Genome analysis shows that the monotremes and snakes have similar venoms

The finding, from an analysis of the genes encoding the dangerous mixture, also reveals the striking similarities between the poisons of different animals. The genes resemble those of other venomous animals, such as snakes, lizards, starfish and sea anemones.
Like eyes, fins and wings, which have evolved independently in a number of different lineages, platypus venom looks to be an example of convergent evolution, says Wesley Warren, a genomicist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, who led the study, published in the journal Genome Biology

This scan turned up 83 genes in 13 different families of toxins, linked to effects including inflammation, nerve damage, muscle contraction and blood coagulation. For instance, platypuses make 26 different kinds of serine protease enzymes, which are also found in the venom of most snakes, and seven of their venom genes resemble a neurotoxin produced by spiders called α-latrotoxin

.

Behavioral evidence for the normal sensing of electric fields came from the work of Lismann (Lismann, 1958; Lismann and Machin, 1958; Machin and Lismann, 1960), thus establishing a new field of research. Electrosensitive neurons have been found in a wide variety of species including:

elasmobranchs such as rays and skates (Murray, 1960; Kalmijn, 1966)

teleost fish (Lismann, 1958; Lismann and Machin, 1958; Machin and Lismann, 1960)
mammals such as the duck-billed platypus (Scheich et al., 1986



)

Convergent evolution describes the acquisition of the same biological trait in unrelated lineages.

The wing is a classic example of convergent evolution in action. Flying insects, birds, and bats have all evolved the capacity of flight independently. They have "converged" on this useful trait.

A number of species – some very large and some small – once roamed the country, but probably became extinct about 500 years ago

Moa were hunted to extinction by Māori, who found them easy targets. Their flesh was eaten, their feathers and skins were made into clothing. The bones were used for fish hooks and pendants

Flightless moa were the only birds in the world to lack any vestige of a wing

Nearest relatives

Ever since moa were revealed to European scientists in 1840, the question of the bird’s closest relative has been debated. Many people assumed that it was the kiwi because the birds lived in the same area. Some researchers still believe this. However, kiwi have wings and moa did not. Others argue that moa are more closely related to emus and cassowaries.

Certainly, moa are distantly related to the other ratites and have had an independent lineage for millennia. The moa ancestor was probably on the land that became New Zealand when it separated from the supercontinent Gondwana, some 85 million years ago. Moa evolved to become unlike any other bird, so comparisons are difficult. They differ genetically from other ratites


http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/moa/page-1

Research published in 2010 has found that the moa's closest cousins are small terrestrial South American birds called the tinamous which are able to fly.^[7] Previously, the kiwi, the Australian emu, and cassowary^[8] were thought to be the closest ancestors
wikipedia

.Contrary to

expectation, the phylogenetic analysis shows that the kiwis are

more closely related to Australian and African ratites than to

the moas. Thus, New Zealand probably was colonized twice by

ancestors of ratite birds

http://www.pnas.org/content/89/18/8741.full.pdf

The most surprising result of the phylogenetic analysis is that
the two groups of New Zealand ratites have different origins,
the moas representing an earlier divergence among ratites,
whereas the kiwis more recently shared an ancestor with the
ostrich and Australian ratites.


It has been claimed that the ancestor of modern ratites was
flightless (27) and that the major ratite groups evolved due to
the break-up of Gondwanaland. However, the fact that moas
and kiwis do not constitute a monophyletic group is incompatible
with the view that all branching events between major
groups of ratites were caused by continental break-ups.
Under the assumption of a flightless ratite ancestor, the
moas, which represent an early divergence among the ratites,
and the kiwis, which represent a later divergence, must have
been isolated together when New Zealand was separated
from Australia at approximately 80 million years ago (28, 29).
A more unlikely alternative would be that a kiwi ancestor
arrived later by swimming. On the other hand, if the ratite
ancestor was flying and flightlessness evolved several times
among ratites, the kiwis can be assumed to have arrived later
than the moas on New Zealand. Such an ancestral flying kiwi
may have been related to the approximately 50- to 60-millionyear-
old flying birds with archaic palates that have been
found in North America and Europe (1, 2). The idea that birds
can lose flight capacity and change their morphology in
adaption to a ground-dwelling existence over a short time
span has support from island faunas on New Zealand (21) and
elsewhere (30, 31). Further work on the rate of evolution of
the 12S rRNA gene in birds is necessary to clarify this point.


.

THE HEART OF AN ALLIGATOR

While most reptiles have 3-chambered he

arts, the heart of alligators, and all crocodilians, has 4 chambers, a trait shared with mammals and birds. The advantage of a 4-chambered heart is that oxygenated blood and deoxygenated blood are separated, which results in more efficient respiration needed for the high metabolism of endothermic (warm-blooded) animals, and enables different pulmonary (lung) and systemic blood pressures, but is seemly over-complex fo

r ectothermic (cold-blooded) crocodilians

Amphibians have a three-chambered heart, while mammalian, crocodilian, and avian hearts have four chambers, two each for pulmonary and systemic circulations. The acquisition of a fully septated ventricle has evolved independently in birds, mammals, and crocodilians¹⁰, and is an important example of convergent evolution

Professor Roger Seymour from the Discipline of Environmental Biology says the modern crocodile heart is evidence that they were originally warm-blooded creatures that evolved into cold-blooded ones - an assertion which turns conventional evolutionary theory on its head.
"There's an assumption that warm-bloodedness always evolves from cold-bloodedness, because being warm-blooded is seen as better - this is a reversal of that thinking," he said